Clauses 304, Sections 11 and 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), the testimony of section 417 were both natural witnesses who were present on the occasion of their presence and also supported the motivating component of the story. At the end of the trial, his statements were acknowledged by the accused, but his testimony was rejected by the trial court on ridiculous and twofold grounds. The trial court also ignored the case. Daylight, and if the investigating officer's presence was not considered to have ocular evidence, he would have been arrested The search for a suspect, which was of paramount importance, should not have been dealt with by a remote police officer under a prosecution case, however, confirming the account's independence had been available for a long time. The purpose of filing an FIR in conjunction with the proceedings, in the form of immediate registration, the accused, who was convicted under the sect, Ion 304, Part II, PPC, has been subjected to innocent wounds Due to which he was unarmed, the intention of the attacker case against the accused was not disclosed due to his death and injuries, under which he was arrested. Collection 302, PP came in a circle. Instead of section 4304, Part II, PPC, and accordingly he was sentenced and sentenced to fines, such as his life after being acquitted under section 2302, PPC, under trial. Had gained hope
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
