Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHM DIN versus SHAFQAT ALI


Section 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The petition against the British High Court, primarily because of the absence of satisfactory explanation for the presence of eye-witnesses at the relevant time. Rejected The High Court also denied the recovery evidence. The reasons given by the High Court for rejecting evidence of ocular testimony and recovery as articles of infringement that prevented the holding of this part of the prosecution were valid and there was no justification for interference in the High Court decision. In response to the request the request was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Shogram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.