NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus IFTIKHARUL HASSAN
Section 2302 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) allowed the appeal in the prosecution's case itself that the accused had killed the victim on the provocation of his father and brother and there was no enmity between the victim and the accused. , Which led to the observation. According to the High Court, ocular evidence was not disclosed on the other hand it was alleged that the victim called him Katemite and also attacked his sister's character thus causing the culprits not to be executed. Was deducted from. In the sentencing case, the High Court's appeal for arbitrary interference was denied in the circumstances [conviction]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Larkana lawyer