DESIGN GROUP OF PAKISTAN versus CLIFTON CANTONMENT BOARD
The Arbitration Act 1940 Sections 26, 28 and 30 held the award award separately for a period of 4 months longer than the period prescribed by the arbitrator when the arbitrator entered on the reference, before the award was awarded by the plaintiff, holding What could have been was that staying on such a fault of law could delay the award of the court award, but the arbitrator, despite being cautious about such delays by the defendants, did not refrain from giving the award and His hand failed to hold until it was extended. The court could not be delayed in such circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer
