GHULAM QASIM versus SOHNA
Section 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The petition against the reasons assigned by the High Court in the dismissal of the ocular testimony, which was the main purpose of the prosecution case, was good and accurate ocular testimony. This was not of the standard and probability, a price which would be sufficient to sustain the capital charge, no basis for review of the evidence was made but leave to appeal in the circumstances was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer
