SAKIHA versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), VEHARI
The Allotment of Land for the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of 1958 and this was affirmed in 1977 when the appellants had no rights in the country. Were. The Appellate challenged the High Court that in not reopening the case it was justified that the strong basis for dismissing the appeals was that they were not a party to any litigation in which the Rehabilitation Commissioner's order Was deposed or the appellant on the other hand was dismissed. The constitutional plea is to be a party to the litigation as well as to the respondents where the order of the Commissioner of Rehabilitation was ordered to be executed and, thus, to be a party to the interim which shall be declared by the Supreme Court. There will be restrictions on the proportion of the rule made. Pir Bakhsh's case has been reported as PLD 1987 SC 145 but despite the proportion of judgment where restoration cases have been neglected in other cases n the appeal against the High Court decision was dismissed by the Commissioner. Which was without merit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Hunza Nagar lawyer