Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE

Section 302/307/452/34 Evidence, in the testimony of both defendants, alleges that they fired one shot at the prosecutor's witnesses, medical evidence found injuries to one prosecutor's witness and left. The finger terminal was one on the back and outer side of the phalanx. Between the thumb and middle finger muscles on the back of the other's right hand, the firearm's direct injury to the other prosecutor's witness was a wound below the joint of the wrist on his left arm. Evidence of enmity could not have been the result of a firing of witnesses in the background of a suspect, fired by two defendants on two of the prosecution's witnesses, and given that there was inconsistent evidence from the medical evidence, the strong possibility could not be ruled out. Is. The prosecution's witnesses may have been subjected to the single-shot wandering pellets, of which it is not certain who fired him. The accused W. W. benefited from the suspicion more than ever. Was raised list of supreme court advocates from Kurram lawyer