MUHAMMADUNEES ALIAS PIR BADSHAH versus GHULAM HASSAN
The notification of the Board of Revenue of the Pre-Impression Act, section 8 (2) of section 8 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, provided that the premature extension of a period of three years is provided. No right to sovereignty exists. In connection with the sale of immovable property, the market value in Mianwali district in favor of a person displaced from Mianwali district by the construction of Chashma Barrage was not more than Rs. 10,000 and was confirmed by the Commissioner of the Division. ? Released on January 7, 1972, while the sale was made on July 15, 1970, and with the exception of the pre-notification notification effect on July 14, 1971, an exception was filed on January 7, 1972, despite the disappointment applied. Could not be done. It was necessary to establish a superior right not only at the time of sale and litigation, but also at the time of the approval of the order in its favor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
