Find a Lawyer

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OX XX, R 6 The appeal was based on the premise that the question raised in the petition was of public importance and was related to the interpretation of the constitution. And has related the work of parliamentary democracy. Appellant in the country, the federal government during the currency of the proceedings has said that if she was a part of the High Court's unconstitutional decision against which it was exempted, it would be satisfied. Required notice is required under XXVIA. , R 1, CPC was not given to the Attorney General, before the constitutional question is settled, an exception is made and the appeal is dealt with accordingly One of the respondents was asked to appeal. Had no objection to the settlement of the application as requested. The appellant's other respondents, however, objected to the settlement of the appeal on such a short ground, but did not file any appeal against the order. The High Court, however, eventually turned against it and thus its meaning was disputed. Was not, therefore, dismissing the appeal, and ordered that the offender guilty of the High Court judgment be acquitted with the observation that in all other cases the decision would be made. stand up advocate for immigration from More kunda lawyer