Find a Lawyer

MUNIR HUSSAIN versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/382/148/149/109 pre-arrest bail, the only allegations against the accused in the FIR were dismissed. The suspects stayed one night at his house, there is no criminal conspiracy charge against the accused, after two police witnesses told the police that the suspects had distributed firearms to the original culprits. Was not taken into the FIR and his presence at the moment cannot be temporarily certain that he was a resident of any other village of Mullah. In the case of enmity between the two witnesses and the accused, the utility of the police or the complainant can be ascertained, which was evidenced by the documentary evidence. Several petitions were recorded and the police showed up against him on this account even though the accused, according to him, has joined the investigation, yet he has been accused of not doing so. The first evidence of the police and the complainant separately was that Alibiya's plea taken by the accused could be proved after examining the witnesses, the lower court denied the circumstances with the order to grant the accused a pre-arrest warrant. ? us immigration advocates from Daulat Pur lawyer