TRIBUNAL MANNAN GUL versus MESSRS SANAULLAH WOOLLEN MILLS LTD., KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 0 12 Returns Returns on the basis that the three departments in the mill were contracted because there was no production in these departments. ? The cross-examination was entered into by the employees in the fact of giving certain standard or required quantities to the departments on the contract and there was no evidence to show that the departments were subsequently withdrawn by the employer. But the employees proved their mistake in giving the contracts to the departments. Notices were served on the Notice Board of Mill and Retention Workers, which showed that the employer had sent them notices to their last known address through a registered post, refusing to accept such notices to employees. Had fully complied with the provisions of Section 12, the application for workmanship against the Order of Complaint Arbitration was fine and dismissed by the Labor Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Tarmatan lawyer