Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI

The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) Stamp Act (I1 of 189), Section 35 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), rejecting the Article 199 Order alleges that it was based on fraud and misrepresentation. The assessee claimed that she never used any gift in favor of the borrower, and also stated that despite the decree approval of the decree in her favor, the contract for the lease of property in the bank trial court itself Was a witness to testify when the lease was put into operation. The evidence, furthering the document and estimating substantial fines, demanded the respondent to deposit the documents before the evidence was received, respondent reviewed the trial court's order before the Additional District Judge and It was directed that the applicant be allowed to guide his or her evidence for the exposition of the documents. The staggering High Court has said that the question of whether the applicant should pay a penalty or not, was a matter of concern for the State and not of the decree holder's responsibility because of the fact that He didn't want that. Considering the important evidence that comes on the record that it will play an important role in the decision on this question, even if it has already obtained a decree through fraud, accepting such a debate is the way to full justice. I would like to put in place unnecessary obstacles. Thus, the High Court, correctly stated that the matter was not capable of exercising its discretionary constitutional jurisdiction, there was no basis for interference, the appeal was dismissed. famous supreme court advocate from Makli lawyer