Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALIM versus STATE

Section 2234/34 & & II II4, Part II evidence of self-accusation of testimony was not self-denial, but counter-prescription was formulated, keeping both versions in juxtaposition, the defense version was neither reasonable nor feasible. Witnesses widely supported the prosecution's story. Medical evidence in the FIR also supported the prosecution case, in all probability there were not two incidents but only one incident which resulted in a dispute between the accused and the deceased on the money issue, there was no previous rivalry between the parties. He was also a friend and friend of the accused and never before. There was a dispute between them that the accused had no motive for premature killing and it appeared that he had allegedly stabbed the deceased to the left of his chest for a moment in a fever of emotion. That it can be adorned with knowledge. The cause of the injury which caused him to die was that of the accused being disclosed to Secetto N-302, Section 304 of PPC, Part II, PPC and its The death sentence was changed to seven years. The RI was sentenced to penalties for the accused but it retained the benefit of Section 382B, which was also extended by the CRPC. top advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer