BASHIR ULLAH versus STATE
Section 302, 30`7 / 149 and 148 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) killed two persons with two arm wounds and according to the doctor's opinion none of them were fired from shotgun. What could have happened, however, was witnesses accusing B of attacking him with a gunshot wound. Witnesses acquitted the perpetrators, who suffered a gunshot wound to the leg of the witness. The evidence to consider the question as to whether, as a result of the High Court, the nine accomplices were falsely implicated and the motive alleged by the prosecution was false, they were not based on the correct principles of criminal justice administration. r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sambrial lawyer
