SHER MUHAMMAD versus REVENUE OFFICER
Article 12 ()) argues that the Tribunal should not withhold the consequential benefits of the proceedings against the applicant after the illegal and unconstitutional in the view of the law that some procedure in the departmental proceedings against the applicant. Received the error and could not receive the remand after accepting the appeal. Instead, given the remarks for a fresh investigation that allegations of incompetence and mismanagement would not be considered beyond doubt, there were two possibilities: one to accept an appeal and one to get a fresh trial remand on the same charge. Secondly, in view of the nature of these charges, the applicant should not be put on trial again, which can take a long time in these circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer