SAABAT HUSSAIN KIRMANI versus KANEEZ FATIMA
A XVII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Evidence, no evidence was presented despite the plaintiffs / applicants' misconduct that the suit was dismissed despite several occasions of adjournment pending and the appellant. The court and the high court maintained the order. After examining the record, the High Court concluded that the plaintiffs had been abused enough to present evidence and that the plaintiffs themselves were guilty of wrongdoing, which was a weak case on the merits of the plaintiffs / applicants. Refused to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Killa Abdullah lawyer