BAKHSHI versus FAZAL MUHAMMAD
Additional evidence entered in the second appeal by the High Court, Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3), from trial to trial The decision of the first discharge case and such order was already upheld. And the leave of the second appeal was sought on the basis that the High Court could not admit the additional evidence at the hearing and disposition of the second appeal, and further that on the basis of further evidence, the decisions of the lower courts were passed by the High Court. The source could not be retained. As the High Court, the Court itself concluded that the evidence was being misrepresented by the lower courts: In addition to the material recorded on the evidence entered in the High Court, the High Court has to confirm and maintain There was enough content for The harmony of fact results from the two courts below Said
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Nawab Shah lawyer