ABDUL QAYYUM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ATTOCK
Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) assumes the tenant that his evidence was sealed without sufficient opportunity for a hearing and was previously declared illegal occupant / offender by a civil suit landlord. He had no such relationship. The landlord and tenant judge of the High Court noted that the tenant was allowed at least four opportunities but failed to do so, so the High Court agreed that the lack of opportunity was unheard of. The tenant is, in fact, having no proof. To support his rejection of the tenancy, therefore, he did not take advantage of all the opportunities, only the material tenant had a copy of the lawsuit filed by the landlord about which the court would like to appear. Which was actually taken note by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
