Article 185 (3) Applicants' appeal was dismissed because the non-pressing order was challenged in review by denying the fact that the appeal was dismissed and an affidavit from the lawyer was also filed on such appeal. The High Court had dismissed the review, the petitioner had failed to believe why the appellate court had recorded the statement from the party if it had not been stated to them before the appellate court orders 9 198 12 The date of 1987 was fixed, certified copies were submitted to the applicant on 16 12 1 987 and the affidavit amended. It was presented before the court before it. 18 1 1988 As the first jurisprudence which was considered to be properly thought of later and was not considered a petition, was held, it had no merit and was excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
