MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN
Article 185 (3) Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXIX, RR l & 2 The temporary injunction restraining the Supreme Court, rarely interferes with the High Court's orders in determining interim relief. Given that no illegal acts, should not be clearly misused. The powers or a serious injustice, easily to be discovered, the Supreme Court would not interfere with the High Court's order which sets the question and / or the extent of interim relief in the case in which the High Court has joint but highly detailed What is the matter with this order. As for the temporary injunction, the respondents properly sought and took precautionary measures to safeguard the interests of the applicant and it is also true that after a great deal of court hearing, many cases May have different opinions on one or the other questions. By the High Court, will it not justify interfering with the orders passed by the High Court in the jurisdiction of the judiciary, the application for leave of appeal was dismissed, the case for urgent settlement was emphasized
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Kandiaro lawyer