MUHAMMAD AMIR versus NOOR MUHAMMAD
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) challenged the part of the plaintiffs because of their involvement in the case in which the plaintiffs / applicants were involved in the case. The respondents' appeal was allowed in such a way that their case did not go beyond their common share \ Khata \ In reviewing the decision of the appellant, the High Court affirmed, though the petitioner from the High Court has so far applied for leave. Was questioned, he asserted that he did not take notice of the same land on the first order but by the High Court with different areas. Or have not been experiencing any errors in the High Court to appeal the decision before it, modify it to appeal was refused leave to appeal by the High Court (p 566] A
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer
