ABDUL GHAFFAR QURESHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 1212 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 3A (b) Appeal for leave to appeal to the appellant against his dismissal was heard by two members of the Service Tribunal in his opinion Was divided, which the chairman heard at the end of the hearing. He took a different view and stated that the appellant was seriously subjected to prejudice due to non-availability of the inquiry report and due to the absence of notice he needed to explain why he was fired. No punishment will be imposed The chairman allowed the appeal and set aside his order. At this stage, the leave of appeal for dismissal of the appellant and the remand case in the case of corruption was approved, whereby the Tribunal chairman agreed with the tribunal's opinion, so the chairman should have been approved. The benefit of doubting the prosecution since the proceedings were of a criminal nature and such benefit was legally obtained was instead another aspect of the matter that deserves consideration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Choa Saiden Shah lawyer