SALEHON MUHAMMAD versus ALLAH YAR
Article 185 (3) Two connected cases pending before the trial court that the evidence listed in one case was copied in another case and further that the judgment was written in one case but some vacancies were filled in the other box. Was copied, even if such a request is made. Accepting the facts, later in the case, the applicants should have objected to the mode of recording of the evidence by the trial court in which they failed to have the same questions, whenever there were any parts of the judgment in the case. If re-submitted, Article 185 (3) cannot be granted an exception to the plea that the cases should have been excluded on the basis of estoppel material, according to court records and concurrent findings. The facts of the present case are related to the fact of Naseer Ahmed. Estoppel's question, reported in Case PLL 1984 SC 403, did not need to be held again Appeal leave was rejected in these circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Takhtbai lawyer
