IJAZ HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND POPULATION WELFARE DEPARTMENT
The NWFP Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Service Rules, when appointing the appellant as a projectionist on 3-4 1968 in the BPS 8 and affirming it was affirmed on 30 6 1981, notified the appellant in 1986 Their ability was not up to the standard set by the rules. For his job, he could not be retained in the job at BPS8 and since he could opt for the held BPS1, the rules enacted in 1986 could not be practically enforceable and thus the appellant's law Or rules do not apply to matter. This may not affect the benefit of the articles / employees and the interests of the articles in any way, unless it is expressly set out in the rules that it allows the natural authority to act as a projectionist under the circumstances. Permission has been directed to
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Leepa lawyer
