Find a Lawyer

BAKHSH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus PAKISTAN

Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (1 of 1913), the decision of section 15 suit was directed by the trial court to deposit the amount according to the date instructed by the prior umpire. Upon the dismissal of the appeal, the pre-emptor submitted a petition to the trial court to submit the pre-arrest amount, but such application was rejected by the trial court appellate court, which required that the civil court should allow the pre-emptor to deposit such amount. Was affirmed by the High Court. The appeal for dismissal of the constitutional application was granted that the court, which was capable of extending the premature deposit, was the appellate court, which dismissed the appeal and not the enforcement court before it. An extension was requested patent advocate from Thul lawyer