Find a Lawyer

DR. FAIZ MUHAMMAD SHAIKH versus THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND

Sindh Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 5 (2) and 6 (1) (a) Disqualification of employment for the discharge of service for the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 To have or not to have In the light of the facts of this case or in the interest of justice, the inquiry officer or the competent officer of the inquiry committee should, of course, use his discretion in a judicial manner and arbitrarily punishable. Deciding not to inquire into the allegations and not the authorized officer, the public servant has to be informed in writing, the action to be taken in this regard will be suggested and where the investigation. It was decided to do so, then the competent government officer had to be charged and the accused public servant had to talk to him, explaining the allegations. IL Servant did not fulfill the legal requirements because it failed to deliver a public servant on the basis of which it was proposed to be punished, but there are allegations against it. The notice from was not in compliance with the legal requirements. In this way all actions and orders based on it were illegal and invalid immigration advocates phone number from Shahkot lawyer