Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules, 1974, R4 (1) Directives for secret reports, remarks against annual secret report on para 43, dismissed Departmental appeal filed before wrong forum for Grade 17 There was a need for a position appellant. To file a departmental appeal against the negative remarks before the authority but to file the same before the wrong forum appellant even though such appeal was filed in the wrong forum, the same case was filed in the same category, It should be prosecuted and such appeal should be sent to the relevant authority. Decision not made by the competent authority, the order passed by the invalid forum was set aside and the appellant was strictly required to apply for a dismissal of the remarks pursuant to para 43 of the instructions on the confidential reports. New opportunity was given [minority ideology]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.