Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COLLECTOR

R6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Dismissal of civil service on charges of corruption, Government servant summarized under R6 (3), effective and disciplinary rules 1975 He was fired as a result of the procedure. , But the Criminal Court Service Tribunal upheld the department's decision to dismiss a civil servant, under which employees protested against the adoption of the summary procedure set out in R6 (3) of the Discipline and Discipline Rules 1975. And had pleaded guilty to a request for a double risk department action against the government. The servant was in the backdrop of a magisterial raid and bribe money, which justified a shorter procedure for which it was analyzed in the Rolls Service Tribunal that the accused was analytical against a substantial reduction of content compared to a public servant. As has been shown in the case of the investigation and no apparent error was found in checking the outward appearance of the department. The authorized authority and the criminal proceedings resulted in the acquittal immigration advocates contact from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer