versus
Para 18 Punjab Civil Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Annual Secret Report Adverted Remarks Reporting Officer made two negative comments against the police officer who was dismissed by the authority against the same police officer. The third consecutive limestone corrected by negative remarks states that revised section No. 32 is considered to be, when the same reporting officer gave two consecutive bad reports to the same police officer, under another reporting officer to such police officer. The amended standing provisions must be violated by the Reporting Officer Or has been, negative negative remarks Appellant police officer ACR was instructed to remove
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Musakhel lawyer
