HAFEEZULLAH versus THE STATE
Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification & Discipline) Rules 1975 R 6 (3) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Discharge due to mismanagement, the Collector has issued a show cause notice to the accused Patwari. There is no need for further investigation into this matter, and after his personal hearing he was dismissed from the job, appellant Patwari was not given the proper defense opportunity, against which to satisfy the unlawful use of official dues and illicit use. Symbol of the law in relation to the charges and the prosecution against it: by the Supreme Court, PLD reported in SC 393 in 1974 That no competent authority was required formal inquiry to the corruption charges have been leveled. Against the accused, the order of dismissal of the appellant was, therefore, not lasting as no formal inquiry was made before such order was approved. The matter was remanded to a competent authority under which the Supreme Court ruled. According to law and practice, there was the option of conducting regular inquiries.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Gharo lawyer
