Find a Lawyer

LATIF JUTE MILLS LTD. versus BALUCHISTAN LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, QUETTA

Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Employees accused of alleged mismanagement in jute mills. Was dismissed from the job, allegedly thrown good quality and good quality bobbins and buried in the ground, which was filed under Section O 15 (3) (b) and (c) of the Employees Complaint of Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968. ) Is equivalent to mismanagement. The application was rejected by the Labor Court under Section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, but his appeal before the Labor Appellate Tribunal was successful and he was restored to the job by the employer with full back benefits. It was affirmed by the High Court that the High Court was not justified in upholding the Labor Appellate Tribunal's decision even though it was not evidence. That the tribunal had no basis to subpoena any specific direct questions to the employee, the inquiry officer was subpoenaed top advocate from Kot Addu lawyer