Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATION AIRLINES CORPORATION versus MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN

Art? 212 (3)? The Customs Act (Fourth of 1969), Section 16? Was the goods brought into the country in violation of sanctions imposed under the provisions of Section 16 Customs Act 1969? Customs seized goods for legal action ?? Applicant corporation employee took action against assisting conveyor belt luggage outside the International Arrival Lounge, forging fake domestic tags and removing him from the domestic cargo section to carry him out of the airport premises. To help? Was such an employee removed from the job after a domestic investigation? Upon appeal the service tribunal ordered employees to be reinstated? Where there was completely false evidence on the tribunal record and came to the conclusion that it was serious and favorable or that it was based on an earlier manifesto and material disregard, Article 212 (3) of the Constitution made its correction. Can interfere with jurisdiction ??? The unwanted order, though, remains to be desired and the evidence is discussed in a very satisfactory manner beforehand. famous high court advocate from Mansehra lawyer