MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus KHUDA BAKHSH
Section 22 Re Revenue Record Facts Reception Applicants assert that the alteration of income records was based on fraud and misrepresentation and thus they were not obliged to do so. The original record has since been deleted and cannot be said. Why the entries in the Revenue Record were changed by the respondents, or their interest as permanent owner of the land in dispute since 1907, and no evidence was available that from time to time they applied. Revenue record was paid to the supporters, speculation about the fact was Revenue Record Which was reinforced when entries for more than half a century remained inconsistent and it was for applicants who sought fraud and misrepresentation to refute the above understanding.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Chashma lawyer
