Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ ALIAS HAKU versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The sentence, the reduction in the FIR, was not recorded as quickly as the prosecutor claimed, presumably due to the consideration and some of the prosecution's story after the initial investigation. Time could have been wasted. On the ocular account both pieces of evidence were not natural witnesses, but most could have been witnesses of the occasion except for the oral statements of the witnesses, no coherent material was available to prove that the witnesses were physically present. Were present at On this occasion, the witnesses of the Syed have made unbelievable corrections in their statements at the trial and said that according to the medical evidence, improvement has been made to bring the case to the fore. Both witnesses also received a wound on the man. The defendant's testimony was contradictory, and the testimony from his previous statement was not proved by any substantial evidence. The whistleblower and even his motive was not attributed to the accused. Recovering arms from the accused was legally unforgettable. S that spot was empty and it may not yield any. It is not said that the same weapon was used during the incident, the prosecution also failed to present to the persons who arrested the accused immediately after the incident with the said weapon, The names of the accused were also not disclosed, the accused also claimed that he had picked up the pistol on the spot and that the victim was related to himself by firing. Defendant's request also goes to trial immigration advocates contact from Miran Shah lawyer