Find a Lawyer

BAKHAT ZADA versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION BANNI, RAWALPINDI

Termination of High Court FIR's powers under Section 6161 AA Foreign Act (XXXI of the year 1946, Constitution14 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 199 Section 6161A, CCP) Read with art, the practice was not available to the perpetrator / accused of the jurisdiction. For trial and disposal in the main case, the petition for dismissal of the FIR petition was not eligible for hearing and the applicant was arrested by the local police on the charge of staying in Pakistan without any documents. Two contradictory versions / claims have been placed before the High Court, one by the police and the other by the applicant / accused and the High Court was not obliged to inspect, analyze and inspect, he said. Has challenged this charge. The FIR was established in the petition with the request that he was not a foreigner, but a resident of Bajaur Agency. The petitioner submitted some documents in support of his application before the High Court, which was challenged by the High Court in litigation. Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the application was decided while reading with section 555 and it was not expected that the PCP should present its defense version and the documents were not the provisions of Article 199 of the Constitution instead of the High Court. ? Its purpose was to obstruct the investigation of criminal cases, even though it had inherent powers under Section 561 AA CR PC, but said the provisions were intended to thwart pending criminal proceedings before the trial court or by the investigating agency petition. Dismiss the front investigation without any substance immigration advocates phone number from Chak Jhumra lawyer