S. M. IQBAL versus S. M. AZIM
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the trial court made the award roll of the court on 31st 1978, the petitioner's petition was filed on 7th 1978 1978, after several years the petitioner for the late condolences. Was excluded and so his appeal was the petitioner's argument that the award was given after a fixed time, was a fool, and therefore, the appeal, despite the restriction, should be treated as such. The commenter did not comment on this point regarding the extension. From time to time, and this was not the case in which the award was found to be flawed, it could be considered as a plea bargain that justified the intervention of the Supreme Court in dealing with the question by the High Court. Failed to create. By, refused to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Khangah Sharif lawyer
