Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

S. M. IQBAL versus S. M. AZIM


Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the trial court made the award roll of the court on 31st 1978, the petitioner's petition was filed on 7th 1978 1978, after several years the petitioner for the late condolences. Was excluded and so his appeal was the petitioner's argument that the award was given after a fixed time, was a fool, and therefore, the appeal, despite the restriction, should be treated as such. The commenter did not comment on this point regarding the extension. From time to time, and this was not the case in which the award was found to be flawed, it could be considered as a plea bargain that justified the intervention of the Supreme Court in dealing with the question by the High Court. Failed to create. By, refused to appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.