Article 185 (3) the plaintiff filed a lawsuit to declare that she did not sell the respondents through a sale deed that was fraudulent and obtained with fraud and that Was thus ineffective against the rights of the applicant. The applicant's point is that neither the sale process was carried out nor did the respondents prove this by presenting a minor witness to the sale deed, which was related to the question of fact about which the district The judge had already ruled in the appeal, after which the scrutiny of the evidence and all the relevant material on record came to a correct conclusion. The High Court also rightly found it appropriate for any intervention in the FM judge of the district judge. The case is not considered to appeal against the jurisdiction of the High Court of Refusal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
