MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus STATE
Section 498 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), pre-arrest warrant of section 489F, confirming that there is no dispute regarding the issuance of a check to the complainant by the accused, in this case the actual dispute is required. Was the complaint fraudulently issued for fraud? Or, with the clear intention, the matter between the parties was purely civil, which was already a subtle decision in the forum before the accredited forum whereby the bank manager's certificate proved that there was enough in the account of the accused. Due to the absence of money the deposited checks were not dishonored, but under their own instructions the disclosure was denied, while issuing the check has no dishonest intention to deceive or deceive the complainant. Which was the main component of the offense under section 489 FPPC and a report was filed under section 173, CR. The prosecution of the accused presented in the relevant court will not serve any profitable purpose. The interim pre-arrest bail in the police custody has already been approved by the accused, it has been confirmed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mangowal lawyer