Section 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 18 and 22 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 411 and 109 guarantees, further inquiry law officer's grant cannot be successful in providing any plausible explanation that Why passports? Controversial visa stickers were sent to the British High Commission for verification; after more than three months, the passport remained in the custody of the FIA during that period, it can be said remotely that the accused played a role. There was no evidence in the record that the visa stickers were involved in the theft of visa stickers on their way to the British Embassy in the UK from Moscow, saying that the suspects alleged that the visa stickers were a device used for counterfeiting purposes. Or the article was not recovered. There was no crime in the charge of possessing fake documents, unless it was shown that it was used as genuine and no evidence was available on the record. Passports with fake or stolen visa stickers were used. The investigation by the FIA was lacking in many cases, and initially there was no ambiguous material that stated that the accused was to be directly or indirectly linked to the theft of stickers, his counterfeit fake. The material collected by the FIR along with the FIR revealed that the provisions of section 18 of the Immigration Ordinance, 1979, were not initially attracted to the accused's case, which is evidence of the evidence available on record. Was not and is not sufficient to connect the accused, Mills under Section 22 of the Immigration Ordinance, 1979
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
