MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE
Suspicion arose over the issue of prosecution by delay of two months delay in filing Section 497 Sanctions Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 406 bail, FIR, and the possibility of debate could not be ruled out if in fact. If that happens then there was no reason. The complainant had to wait two months and then file a complaint with the police immediately to recover his vehicle for filing an FIR, but he did not do what it was alleged that the accused did. The vehicle sold was for sale. Accordingly, he was equally liable to prosecute under Section 6406 PPC, and he had already been granted bail under the trial court's consistency, demanding that the accused be granted bail as well. , Section 6 406 PPC was not attracted to the facts and circumstances of the case. There was no direct evidence against linking the accused to his commission
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Bhalwal lawyer
