SHAUKAT ALI versus RAHWALI SUGAR MILLS, RAHWALI
Para 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Establishment employees have provided accommodation in the premises. Such accommodation has been allotted to the applicants under the scheme VI High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. The orders have been ordered to be without legal authority. The legal effect and the case was remanded to the authority. The High Court did not present a case for interference in such an order as the question to be considered was whether the properties transferred to the applicants were part of the Establishment premises. The latter has been sold which is a question. In fact, the High Court had taken notice that none of the settlement authorities had taken into account the various documents that the Establishment wanted to present in support of their claim with regard to the Settlement Authority for a new High Court decision. Thus, the appeal for justification was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Piplan lawyer