Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAUKAT ALI versus RAHWALI SUGAR MILLS, RAHWALI


Para 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Establishment employees have provided accommodation in the premises. Such accommodation has been allotted to the applicants under the scheme VI High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. The orders have been ordered to be without legal authority. The legal effect and the case was remanded to the authority. The High Court did not present a case for interference in such an order as the question to be considered was whether the properties transferred to the applicants were part of the Establishment premises. The latter has been sold which is a question. In fact, the High Court had taken notice that none of the settlement authorities had taken into account the various documents that the Establishment wanted to present in support of their claim with regard to the Settlement Authority for a new High Court decision. Thus, the appeal for justification was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Barbar Loi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.