RANA IMRAN JAMEEL versus STATE
Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365B, 376 and 511 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 11 bail, no offense of adultery during grant investigation, offense under Section 365B, The PPC was removed by the Investigating Officer who concluded that during the investigation they concluded that the two alleged victims were not kidnapped at gunpoint, but with the two accused freely on the motorcycle. They roamed with him and the co-accused was declared innocent. Whereas, the accused was challaned under Sections 6376 and 1111 under, the PPC read with Section 11 of the (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979, there was no allegation of rape or adultery, against any of the accused. Not on the record, there were laws in relation to abuse or fornication. The facts and circumstances of the case do not apply. The Prima fee case came under section 496A, PPC, for which the sentence imposed was seven years which did not fall within it. The prohibition contained in Section 777, Section () of the CCPC, as no weapon of crime was recovered by the complainant during the interrogation of the accused, was behind bars only after the arrest and subsequent investigation. Purpose was not guaranteed. The accused, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Mohmand lawyer