Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 412/34, the grant of further investigation was not among the accused persons who committed the robbery and against them in the FIR or I was never charged. As supplementary statements when he was accused of receiving stolen property only. For the accused to be involved in the crime, the prosecution had to prove primarily that they knew of the stolen property or had reason to believe that the gold jewelry recovery was affected. There was also a matter of further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2). In the Supplementary Statement, the prosecution had its own case that the two other accused named in the supplementary statement had gold jewelery in gold bars. Were changed. Receiving stolen property fraudulently in the commission of robbers in section 959595, PPC as well as section 121212, PPC, though not mentioned in the table in section 4545 ((1), C). And the compound was not capable, but in the present case, the parties voluntarily acquitted themselves and forgave the alleged crime and settled in the external courts, saying that the bail in the interest of justice and justice. A judicial notice for compromise can also be taken in offenses that were not understandable because there was no indictment. That the accused had been charged with a jacket and that the charge against him was about the recovery of stolen property in a robber, the offense of the accused was a matter of further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2). , CCP ask a advocate free from Goular Khel lawyer