Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) definition of evidence, reduction of mitigating circumstances expected to be the case of two incidents, according to the prosecution, the accused shot and killed, while the defense version was that the defendant was shot in the rifle. Accidentally left When the two, who were close friends, were discussing three of the prosecution's witnesses, one person was a freelance witness because he was neither affiliated with the complaining party nor before the accused was killed. Was invalid from. The witnesses had some kind of enmity with the accused, in which case there was no motive to be involved in false accusations of murder in which the death sentence was pronounced. All witnesses testified to each other on the material aspects of the case, the ocular evidence was reliable, reliable and straightforward, nothing was on record, based on which their evidence could be declared unnatural. The SS examined the length, but remained steadfast in its position and there was no good evidence left in its evidence. The ocular evidence was fully supported by the doctor's evidence, which reinforced the recovery of the rifle even after the doctor who performed the autopsy on the body of the accused prosecutor. The accused was not denied due to a firearm injury The evidence of the prosecution was far more reliable than the defense because the defense version did not fit the scheme of things so the defense version was also liable to be dismissed because the cross. During the examination, the accused presented contradictory proposals for the witnesses, the defense version was nothing, but the story of a rooster and a bull, and on the contrary, the prosecutor suspected his case. power of attorney advocate Naseerabad lawyer