Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus PUNJAB PROVINCE SERVICE THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL

Article 42 The plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the declaration that the trees on both sides of the District Council Road were standing and water was cleared for 30 minutes. It is said that the tree plaintiff alleges that the authorities approved previous orders which reduced the water period. Water was approved for 30 minutes to 15 minutes in favor of the defendant and it was also stated that the illegal, collective and unreported suit was permanently declared as a trial court and an appeal court. ? The defendant was that in the year 626262 in, a matter was settled between his father and other Moga partners in which his father was given the right to receive water for an hour to irrigate his land. Was, if he allows it to be built by Khalil. The plaintiff in her land asserted that in view of the settlement the road was irrigated in favor of her father for 15 minutes in water and W for one hour. Legitimate evidence has proven on the record that the ban was changed by the administration and the plaintiff's share was reduced by fifteen minutes from the back, but the order passed by the authorities fell under Audi's ultimatum rule. Were. Partial and final decisions of the plaintiff and the orders passed by the trial court and the appellate court below were not dealt with in any kind of unlawful interference or material misconduct, which was dismissed for good. Was. immigration advocate from Lasbela lawyer