Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD AHMAD versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (b), 147 and 148 was the result of a sudden outburst between members of the same family in which they accused the missing women of attacking them with theft. The trial court did not open the grounds for a reasonable and acceptable trial, the trial was not open to the trial court, the exception was for the accused, the lawyer for the accused to modify the plea filed to increase the life sentence Was deleted The accused's brother-in-law, the murder of his sister's husband / acquaintance, and his wife quarreled with each other, resulting in the prosecution's case that the victim's wife was the victim's victim. She left home and took shelter in her parents' home. The deceased followed him and entered his father-in-law's house, where he suffered death at the hands of his brother-in-law and in the manner of the incident in front of him, it can be safely said that the victim himself was in trouble. And had played a part in his own murder, if the deceased did not go to his parents' house behind his wife, he would not have faced death. At the trial of his brother in a legal trial, the defendant was declared right to life imprisonment and was told that after the wrong decision, the amount of the sentence was based on fact or legal basis. Was not open to exception. The co-accused is dismissed for allegation and appeal against the conduct of women, dismissed for being without substance and for not having filed an appeal by the accused against their punishment and punishment. registration advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer