Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 4 364/34 34 Testimony of evidence, account of evidence related to evidence related to reduction in minor age of the accused is confirmed by medical evidence. Details of the injured persons were abducted by the accused and There were many injuries to the important and unimportant parts of it. Due to his death, the trial court convicted both the accused and sentenced one accused to life imprisonment and the other to life imprisonment. Not everyone's injuries were specifically mentioned in the FIR, nor in testimony before the trial court. But the fact is that in such cases it was not humanly possible for the witnesses to count and confirm each of the accused persons even though the witnesses were concerned but only because, their testimony was not denied. The prosecution's witnesses were natural witnesses, whose presence could not be doubted. The account presented by the prosecutor's testimony was reliable, although some minor contradictions and improvements were identified in his testimony, but he was naturally modest in nature and did not adversely affect his evidence. The medical examination was performed by the doctors who examined the postponement of the injury and who performed the post-mortem examination on the casualty was in line and accordingly. An ocular account was presented through eye witnesses; medical evidence supported the weapons used in the commission of the crime at the time of the incident, the location of the injuries, according to a statement under Section 342, C.C. P was under 18 years of age and not challenged by the High Court of Prosecution. jobs for fresh advocates from Bhera lawyer