ZIA ULLAH versus STATE
Section 497 Gambling Prevention Act (XXVIII of 1977), Section 8 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 22 bail, the grant of the prosecution case was that the Department HO police received a confidential notice that The accused had a rented room. Used as a gambling house and raided the aforementioned room and found that the accused, instead, was engaged in bottling the liquor department HA liquor, causing him to be a district magistrate, or sub divisional. Had failed to provide any confidential information to the magistrate or first class magistrate. The accused's room was searched at the powers and functions of the officers in the relevant provisions of the required rules and he did not remain within the specified scope and thus his conduct could not be approved. No basis was provided for linking the accused to the violation of the essential provisions of the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer