SHAHZAM IMRAN KHAN versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD
Section 14 and 64 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant's Failure to Appeal Against Applicant's Approval of Nomination, Applicant's Petition Against Respondent's Approval of Nomination However, the Tribunal's way of filing an appeal before the Election was the first fatal to the applicant's failure to file an Election Tribunal, as the defendant's nomination was no secret matter and the second nomination was objectionable. The appeal against accepting nomination papers was generally known to everyone. Were interested in nominating a candidate. Third, the selection process, such as nomination scrutiny, also had to be completed within a stipulated period. Fourth, the treatment of appeals before the Election Tribunal was more appropriate and easier, and finally the Public Representation Act, 1976 provided a mechanism for interference with constitutional jurisdiction in the present case, and the whole of the candidate's nomination. Action will take place. , In practice, was dismissed as a waste constitutional exercise
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Doltala lawyer