Find a Lawyer

QUDRAT ULLAH versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the prosecutor's eye witnesses did not bring anything to establish their presence independently at the time of the incident unless, for some reason On the occasion the witness cannot easily be convinced by the criminal court. Because his presence was reliably available on record through some independent evidence before the court, there was no independent evidence or circumstance available on record to prove the testimony of eyewitnesses in this case. I found a lot of features that created it. The police station set up by the prosecution in the case was pending and was unsuccessful when the FIR was allegedly not lodged in connection with serious suspicion about the presence of witnesses at the time of the incident. Provide some kind of co-operation in the ocular account presented to the trial court, the legal status of the defendant being taken into custody during the investigation and consequently the eviction of a crime was illegal because of the forensic science laboratory It was clearly established in the report that the rifle as well as the crime was recovered That was it. The said laboratory could not be ruled out on the same day and possibly the possibility that a crime was declared vacant, only on the basis of the trial court's prosecution of a rifle allegedly in the possession of the accused by the public. Recovery was reported. Except for the complainant himself, who stated that he did not make a statement regarding the recovery mentioned to the inquiry officer jobs for fresh advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer